Monday 15 November 2010

Kenya, Uganda lead EA in remittances


EABW CORRESPONDENT


WASHINGTON-Kenya and Uganda receive more money from abroad than their neighbours, a World Bank survey shows.

Remittance flows to Sub-Saharan Africa will reach US$21.5b this year after a small decrease in 2009 due to the global financial crisis, according to Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011, a World Bank publication that tracks documented private transfers of funds and migratory patterns around the world.

The book shows that Africa-bound flows fell by about four percent between 2008 and 2009, marking the first decrease since 1995.

In absolute dollars, Nigeria is by far the top remittance recipient in Africa, accounting for US$10b in 2010, a slight increase over the previous year (US$9.6 b).

Other top recipients include Sudan (US$3.2 b), Kenya (US$1.8 b), Senegal (US$1.2 b), South Africa (US$1.0b), Uganda (US$0.8b), Lesotho (US$0.5 b), Ethiopia (US$387m), Mali (US$385m), and Togo (US$30m).

Remittances to Uganda will reach an estimated US$773 million in 2010, up from US$694 million the previous year. "We estimate that recovery will continue over the next two years, with remittance flows to the continent possibly reaching about US$24b by 2012," said Dilip Ratha, manager of the Migration and Remittances unit at the World Bank.

Ratha cautions that these numbers are gross underestimates, because millions of Africans rely on informal channels to send money home.

Worldwide, remittance flows are expected to reach US$440b by end-2010, up from US$416bs in 2009. About three-quarters of these funds, or US$325b, will go to developing countries.

The World Bank estimates that flows to developing countries as a whole will rise further over the next two years, possibly exceeding US$370b by 2012.

"Remittances are a critical lifeline for families and entire communities across Africa, especially in the aftermath of the global crisis," Ratha said.

"The fact that remittances are so large, come in foreign currency, and go directly to households, means that these transfers have a significant impact on poverty reduction, funding for housing and education, basic essential needs, and even business investments."

There is a pressing need to make it easier and cheaper to send and receive remittances in Africa. The average cost of sending money to Africa is more than 10%, the highest among all the regions.

The cost of sending money within Africa is even higher.

As a share of gross domestic product, the top recipients in 2009 were: Lesotho (25%), Togo (10%), Cape Verde (9 percent), Guinea-Bissau (9 percent), Senegal (9 percent), Gambia (8 percent), Liberia (6 percent), Sudan (6 percent), Nigeria (6 percent), and Kenya (5 percent).

The book estimates that nearly 22 million Sub-Saharan Africans have left the continent.

Africa also has a higher intra-regional migration rate than the rest of the developing world, with three out of four African migrants living in another country in Sub-Saharan Africa.

In general, islands and fragile or conflict-afflicted states have the highest rates of skilled emigrants.

Nationals who attended university and left their country the most are from Cape Verde (68 %), Gambia (63%), Mauritius (56%), Seychelles (56%), Sierra Leone (53%), Ghana (47%), Mozambique (45%), Liberia (45%), Kenya (38%), and Uganda (36%).

Africa's most dynamic migration corridors are Burkina Faso-Côte d'Ivoire (1.3 million migrants), Zimbabwe-South Africa (0.9 million), and Côte d'Ivoire-Burkina Faso (0.8 million).

Others include Uganda-Kenya, Eritrea-Sudan, Mozambique-South Africa, Mali-Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo-Rwanda, Lesotho-South Africa, and Eritrea-Ethiopia.

The Factbook relies on data publicly available from reliable sources. As a result, data on some important migration corridors-for example, from Zimbabwe to South Africa, are not adequately covered in the book.