Wednesday, 10 February 2010

The Tanzania President saluting Col Gadhafi as the out going President of the African Union

Britain and the Middle East in the 9/11 Era
Britain’s participation in the invasion of Iraq in 2003 marked a dramatic shift in the direction and focus of British relations with the Middle East. This new Chatham House book provides the first extensive examination of the impact of 9/11 on the UK's policy towards this critical region.The book places Britain’s involvement firmly within the rich historical context which is essential for understanding the legacy of empire and demonstrates how the New Labour leadership willfully ignored the lessons to be learned from past experience. It also argues that Britain not only paved the way for US engagement in the Middle East, but also became tainted by association with a US project for reforming the region that has foundered.Dr Rosemary Hollis analyses in detail how the Blair government handled the Iraq crisis, invasion and fallout, including developments in relations with Iran. She also documents Britain’s ‘niche’ role in the Middle East peace process, arguing that arms sales, trade and finance bind Britain to the Arab Gulf states.Praise for Britain and the Middle East in the 9/11 Era:‘A wonderful and fascinating contribution to our understanding of Britain's place in the morass created by 9/11. This is the first work to set these current events in their true historical context. An absolute must for anyone wishing to understand the UK's role in the wider Middle East.'Jon Snow, Newscaster, Channel 4 News'Rosemary Hollis combines breadth of vision with painstaking attention to detail in this comprehensive analysis of New Labour and the Middle East. Anyone who wishes to understand the complexities of the region and the impact on British foreign policy of our relationship with the United States need look no further.'Sir Menzies Campbell MP, former leader, Liberal Democrats'This account of Britain's role in the Middle East under New Labour is a well-written and significant contribution to our understanding of the modern Middle East. It not only sheds light on the Blair government's involvement in Arab–Israeli peacemaking and the post-9/11 ‘war on terror’, but also enhances our understanding of EU involvement and US leadership.Yossi Alpher, former director, Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies'Dr Hollis incisively dissects Britain's relations with the Middle East under New Labour as well as Blair's path to war in Iraq. This is as close to a definitive account as we are going to get for some time.'Tarak Barkawi, Senior Lecturer, Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge

Tuesday, 9 February 2010


Jumuiya ya wazanzibari UK (ZAWA)inafuraha kuwaalika mkutano wahadhara utakaohutubiwa na Katibu Mkuu CUF-Taifa Maalim SEIF SHARIFFHAMAD.Wazanzibari wote,wake kwa waume,waliopo UK na nchi za jiraniwanakaribishwa kuhudhuria. Huu ni mkutano wa kihistoria na wa kwanzakufanyika London baada ya makubaliano yaliyofikiwa baina ya CUF na CCMZanzibar.Kwa vile London ina umuhimu mkubwa katika siasa za Zanzibartunamshukuru Maalim Seif kututunukia ziara yake kama Wazanzibari wamwanzo Ulimwenguni kuhutubiwa baada ya maridhiano kupitishwa.SIKU NA PAHALAJumamosi ya tarehe 13/02/2010Ukumbi wa Durning HallADDRESS:Earlham Grove,Forest Gate London,E7 9AB ,(Nyuma ya Mangala Solicitor.Kwa maelekezo zaidi ya pahala piga simu No: 02085363800UFIKAJI/USAFIRIBus: 25, 86, 58Train. Forest Gate station (British rail)WAKATI: Saa saba na nusu mchana (1.30PM)WAHUSIKA: Kwa maelezo zaidi piga simu No:07957654192, 07960355753,07508016265, 0783180339
World Health Organization and U.S. military team up to deliver 600 radios, 1200 pounds of medical supplies to four clinics outside Port-au-Prince
PORT-AU-PRINCE —Hundreds of Haitians came running as a Marine CH-53 Sea Stallion touched down Feb. 4, scattering dust but gathering a large crowd on a field in Pignon.

Before the boxes were even off-loaded, people of all ages with inquiring eyes and smiling faces stood together, eagerly waiting to see what would come off the helicopter.


The crowd was not disappointed. One by one, members of the Joint Forces Special Operations Component Command, the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit and the World Health Organization walked out carrying boxes full of radios and medical supplies.

Just a few hours later, three more cities all over Haiti—Cap Haitien, Saint Louis du Nord and Gros Morne—had all received boxes of relief aid. In total, the four cities outside of Port-au-Prince received 600 radios and approximately 1,200 pounds of medical supplies


This latest collaboration between the U.S. military and the World Health Organization began a few days ago, when Joint Forces Special Operations Component Command (JFSOCC) members came to the organization with information about medical needs at the clinics in the four cities. After working out the supply logistics, the JFSOCC coordinated air transportation support from the CH-53, which was based on the USS Bataan.

“Providing essential medicines to health professionals during an emergency is critical,” said Ian Stein, WHO emergency response team program officer. “Through this collaboration we were able to expand our capacity to ensure that medicines end up where they are needed.”



The medical supplies provided by the WHO included multiple “Kit 10,000s,” which contain enough medicines, medical devices and equipment to treat 10,000 individuals.

The radios provided by JFSOCC allow more individuals to hear public service announcements regarding humanitarian assistance and messages of hope that the international community is here to help. These solar- and hand-cranked radios are also equipped with a flashlight and a USB-port to charge any device with a USB connection.



All of the supplies were delivered to the various non-governmental organizations that are helping manage the clinics in each of the cities.

“I think this mission today is an example of how partnerships should form in times of emergencies,” Stein said. “We are able to develop nimble plans for immediate response and implement them with success. If we can continue this style of work, we know that we will continue to save lives together.”


The hundreds of smiling people in Pignon, Cap Haitien , Saint Louis du Nord and Gros Morne have already seen the effects of this partnership first-hand.






For more information about this and other U.S. Government initiatives to support Haiti ’s longer-term needs, contact the U.S. Government Joint Information Center at: http://uk.mc274.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=HaitiJIC@USAID.gov.


PORT-AU-PRINCE – An orphanage here in Haiti, which we will not name in order to protect the children living there, was already providing a home to more than 150 orphans prior to the devastating earthquake that struck Haiti on January 12th. Now the number of children has expanded to include those who have recently been orphaned or temporarily separated from their families due to the earthquake, and that number far exceeds the facility’s capacity to care for them. Hearing of the need, the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) recently donated tents, generators, sleeping bags and other assistance to the struggling orphanage



The orphanage, which is working in partnership with the Haitian Government and UNICEF, has seen more than a 60% increase in children being brought to their facility since the earthquake. One of their key needs was shelter to house these new children. The large tents, which can house up to 100 children, are actually the tents the Los Angeles and Fairfax County Urban Search and Rescue Teams used while here in Haiti searching for survivors of the quake. Rather than bringing them back to the U.S. to be repacked and used for the next mission, everyone felt they could be better served here in Haiti to provide these children with a temporary home.


The U.S. Government is dedicated to helping the people of Haiti in any way we can. We are here to save lives and alleviate suffering during this extremely difficult time,” said Tim Callaghan, USAID DART team leader. “Having adopted children myself, being able to help these children in just a small way really has special meaning for me."

In addition to shelter, the institution also required additional latrines. USAID DART’s water and sanitation experts are providing their expertise and guidance on the set up of new latrines, including the best location to ensure the health and safety of the children.



“This is just one example of the many ways in which U.S. Government agencies are collaborating to assist the Government of Haiti and UNICEF to support children affected by the recent earthquake,” Gary Newton, the U.S. Government Special Advisor for Orphans and Vulnerable Children observed. “Many of the staff from these local organizations have, like these children, been deeply affected by the earthquake. It is humbling to see these organizations step up their assistance to children despite their own enormous losses.”


With new shelter facilities, latrines, generators and sleeping bags, the orphanage is now better able to help the Haitian children who have been separated from their families because of the earthquake













Monday, 8 February 2010

GOES-P Set for Launch
In the mobile service tower at Launch Complex 37 on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Fla., a solid rocket booster for the Delta IV rocket, slated to launch NASA's GOES-P satellite as it is lowered toward the base of the rocket. Launch currently is targeted for March 1, 2010.

Image Credit: NASA/Jack Pfaller
PRESS & MEDIA
Global Demonstration Against Unjust Sanctions on EritreaMonday, February 22 13:00 - 18:00 @ United Nation Office in Geneva
We cordially invite you and your Media crew to cover the peaceful demonstration, being held on 22 February 2010 at the United Nation office in Geneva, to protest against the 23 December 2009 (1907) unjust and illegal UN Security Council sanctions imposed against Eritrea.Eritreans will call on all European governments to take decisive actions to immediately lift the unlawful sanctions and restore Eritrea's sovereignty and territorial integrity.The Security Council resolution (1907) is not only unjust, unfair and illegal, it will not bring peace, stability and security to the the Horn region. This is going to be one of the largest manifestation by the Eritrean communities in Europe.The program is scheduled to start at 13;00 and end at 18;00, Monday 22 February 2010. * 13;00 - Media Arrival * 13;30 - Start of Media - Short briefing & Press Package * 14;00 - Manifestation Coverage * 17;00 - Press briefing & Interviews * 18;00 - End of media eventsDemostration meeting point will be at Park of Corpettes (parc des Cropettes) and will start to move at 14;00 sharp behind the train station of Carnavin, towards rue de Montbrillant before joining De France to follow the direction towards UN (Palais des Nations) at Avenue de la Paix.For any further information contact us on http://uk.mc274.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=mediacenter_europe@eritrean-smart.org or visit our website www. eritrean-smart.org.Kinds regards,Media Center

On Launch Pad 39A
The space shuttle Endeavour is seen after the rotating service structure is rolled back on Saturday, Feb. 6, 2010 at Launch Pad 39A of the NASA Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Endeavour and the crew members of the STS-130 mission are set to launch on Sunday at 4:39 a.m. EST. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls



Monday, February 8, 2010
WHEN: 9:00 a.m.
WHAT: The Institute for National Strategic Studies 2010 symposium on "Implementing the New Path for America's Defense" :- 9 a.m.
: Principal Deputy Defense Under Secretary for Policy James Miller delivers opening keynote remarks- 11:45 a.m.: Deputy Defense Undersecretary for Strategy, Plans and Forces Kathleen Hicks delivers remarksWHERE: Fort Lesley J. McNair, 260 Fifth Avenue SW, Washington, DC.CONTACT: 202-685-3857NOTE: Register online: http://www.ndu.edu/inss.index.cfm



News Release

Health and human services department Deploys Mobile Morgue to Haiti

Port-au-PrincE – Today, the United States Government began the work of establishing a temporary morgue and forensic facility to help with the identification and handling of remains of American citizens killed in the January 12 earthquake in Haiti . The hub for this work will be an HHS National Disaster Medical System mobile facility known as the Disaster Portable Morgue Unit or DPMU, which arrived on a flight from Charleston , South Carolina on February 2. A team of 25 specialists have also arrived and will begin the process of identifying American citizens and preparing their remains for return to the United States .

“The magnitude of the loss from this disaster has touched families across Haiti and the world. Americans sadly also lost their lives," said Dr. Tom Sizemore, the HHS Secretary ' s personal representative in Haiti . “Through the work of our dedicated experts and professionals, we hope to make the grieving a little easier to bear as loved ones are reunited with family members."

Initial reconstruction efforts in Haiti started with removal of debris from some sites, including the Hotel Montana where many American citizens are believed to have lost their lives. The Hotel Montana, like many buildings in Port-au-Prince , simply collapsed with one floor falling on another. Uncovering these sites, work known as “delayering,” proceeds slowly and with great care. Consequently, remains still in the Hotel Montana alone may take many weeks to recover.

Positively confirming identity is a painstaking process. Information gathered by interviewing families of missing persons helps provide initial indicators such as tattoos or jewelry. Documents found on the bodies, such as driver’s license, strengthen the identification. But only a few indicators provide positive scientific identification. These include dental details, fingerprints, implantable devices (with serial numbers) and, in some cases, DNA matches. This requires the work of the experts which include imaging specialists, anthropologists, fingerprint experts and morticians who comprise the NDMS Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team.

An interagency U.S. Government team will continue to do everything possible to find and identify U.S. citizens who lost their lives as a result of the earthquake and return them their final resting place in the United States . Americans who are missing family members are encouraged to call the U.S. State Department at 888-407-4747.

# # #

Sunday, 7 February 2010

malaria concortium

MALARIA CONCORTIUM ANNUAL REVIEW LAUNCH AT CENTRAL HALL WESTMINISTER
London, 4 January 2010:
Yesterday evening saw the launch of Malaria Consortium’s 2008-9 Annual Review at a reception in Westminster. Among the audience of approximately 50 people were representatives from donors, corporations, NGOs and the media, as well as Malaria Consortium supporters and colleagues.The evening was presided over by Executive Director of Malaria Consortium, Sunil Mehra, who welcomed everyone and introduced the guests of honour. Speakers included Stephen O’Brien MP, Chairman of Malaria Consortium and Shadow Health Minister, Richard Graham, Head of International Grants, Comic Relief and David Applefield, Financial Times (FT) Special Representative for Africa, the Middle East, and Emerging Markets, and Project Manager for the FT's Combating Diseases series.Richard Graham from Comic Relief challenged many current approaches to controlling disease and funding health initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa. He questioned whether his own organisation’s approach, and those of others is correct.

Malaria Consortium works in partnership with communities, health systems, government and non-government agencies, academic institutions and local and international organisations to ensure good evidence supports delivery of effective services. Together, we work to secure access for groups most at risk, to prevention, care and treatment of malaria and other communicable diseases.
Malaria PreventionIncreasing coverage of effective malaria prevention tools by distributing long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to those who need them and training people to use them properly


MalariaTreatment Improving access to diagnosis and effective treatment, particularly among rural populations.

Malaria control in Emergencies and Conflict/Post-conflict Situations Responding to humanitarian emergencies and increasing delivery of services to hard-to-reach populations and vulnerable groups in these challenging settings.



Conducting research, testing new approaches and assessing new technologies to strengthen the delivery of effective interventions based on evidence and experience from our country programmes.

Childhood IllnessesWorking to secure access to prevention, care and treatment for children most at risk of the most common childhood illnesses.





Saturday, 6 February 2010

Have you ever listened to the famous Nigeria Talking drum

Friday, 5 February 2010




SOURCE: The Citizen (Dar es Salaam)
Tanzania: Dual Citizenship At Last
Mkinga Mkinga
20 January 2010
The law to allow Tanzanians to hold dual citizenship should finally be enacted by the end of the year, Foreign Affairs and International Co-operation minister Bernard Membe said yesterday.
Speaking in Dar e s Salaam at an International Organisation for Migration (IOM) meeting, Mr Membe said research conducted on the proposal had established that the new law would not harm the country.
"The government is regretting locking out Tanzanians overseas during the 49 years of our Independence, while some African countries have been granting dual citizenship to their people," Mr Membe said.
Tanzanians living abroad will receive the news with jubilation, as they have for many years campaigned for the introduction of such a law to enable them to belong to both their host countries and their motherland.
Many have complained that lack of such a law disadvantages them, as it denies them opportunities they could access if they were citizens of the countries where they work.
Yesterday, Mr Membe explained that the issue had taken many years to conclude because the ministry did not wish to "rush such a sensitive issue". He added: "We decided to conduct a thorough research before introducing this law, which deals with the basic rights of a person."

The research had enabled the government to establish that dual citizenship "is not bad, as some people were trying to depict it".
The minister went on: "On the contrary, there will more benefits for the country and the individuals, if we to adopt the law to enable our fellow Tanzanians living abroad to market our country as well."
During the research, it had been found that Tanzanian experts working abroad had been contributing immensely to their host countries. Therefore, he said, the enacting of the law would enable them to also assist their motherland without any hitch.
Mr Membe said the ministry had already started to move to tap the great economic potential of the Tanzanians overseas.
After receiving the report, the ministry established a special department to deal with the affairs of those in the Diaspora.

"Everything regarding how to deal with the Tanzanians living abroad is almost ready. We need to fully utilise their skills and wealth to push forward our development agenda," he said.
The Dual Citizenship Act, the minister added, would give those abroad the right to adopt the citizenship of their host countries while maintaining their Tanzanian nationality.
Under the current law, a Tanzanian who adopts the citizenship of another country is automatically stripped of his nationality.
Minister Membe said they had directed all the country's embassies and high commissions overseas to register all Tanzanians to enable the government to have full information and data on the nationals living abroad.
Speaking to reporters at the meeting, which brought together experts from various ministries, embassies and some Tanzanian experts working in the UK, Mr Daniel Mwasandube, a quantity surveyor based in Britain, said many Tanzanians had opted to leave the country in search of better lives.

He said most of them "are very patriotic but lack of supportive laws", such the one granting dual citizenship, has blocked them from serving their country better.
"Many Tanzanians cannot land high paying jobs abroad, though they have the qualifications, simply because employers look for people who hold the passports of those countries," he said.
In preparation for the introduction of dual citizenship, the Law Reform Commission was tasked to conduct a national study and gather the public's views.
In 2006, the commission recommended amendments to the relevant laws so that Tanzanians can also enjoy dual citizenship.
According to the 'Final Report on the Introduction of Dual Citizenship in Tanzania', the commission chaired by Judge Anthony Bahati, said the issue deserved "a positive and forwarding-looking consideration".

The commissioners said it was high time Tanzania adopted dual citizenship because in a globalised world, the country could not develop without interaction with other nations.
Dual citizenship, according to the commission, was desirable as it conferred benefits both to the country and nationals desiring to hold the citizenships of other countries.
"A person with dual citizenship has greater flexibility in his choice of where to live and/or work," reads part of the report.
But the members of the commission also recommended that national identity cards be issued first before adopting the system.
Once it becomes law, Tanzanians will no longer have to renounce their citizenship, and the same will apply to foreigners wishing to take up Tanzanian citizenship, if their countries of origin allow that.

Thursday, 4 February 2010


REPORT BACK | by Nathi Mthethwa

The road to a society that is free from violent crime: Awulethe umshini wakho - surrender your firearm

Report back by Nathi Mthethwa

The strategic goal of our democratic government led by the African National Congress remains the creation of a united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic, peaceful, secured and prosperous South Africa. All our actions and policies are aimed towards achieving this goal. Democracy enjoins that all South African patriots ought to work together to ensure the success of the process of reconstruction and development of our country. We, collectively and singularly, have a responsibility to bring about a better life for all.

Our country’s Constitution guarantees every person the right to life and the right to security, which includes among other things, the right to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources. Our Constitution further guarantees that adequate protection of such rights is fundamental to the well being, social and economic development of every person. However, the increased availability and abuse of firearms and ammunition contributes significantly to the high and unacceptable levels of violent crimes in our society.

To realise these Constitutional imperatives, the South African Police has embarked on the number of operations. Amongst these are Operation Washa Tsotsi and Operation Duty Calls. Since the launch of Operation Washa Tsotsi on 1 July 2009, a total of 752 criminals have been arrested in coordinated intelligence-led take-down operations and R25, 5 million worth of evidence has been seized. These arrests were over and above arrests made during normal day-to-day policing and detective work.

Operation Duty Calls was launched late in November to counter the usual spike in crime rates during the holiday period. It focused on visible policing at shopping malls and taxi ranks, as well as patrols of popular tourist destinations and operations against illegal firearms. Due to this operation there was a significant year- on-year decline in crimes, including armed robbery, burglary and theft of cash in transit.

To take our fight against crime to a higher level, on 11 January 2010 the South African Police launched the firearm amnesty, Operation Awulethe umshini wakho. Surrender your firearm. It will run until 11 April 2010 and has the following objectives:

  • to advocate for the voluntary surrender for destruction of licensed firearms through the process prescribed in the Firearms Control Regulations.
  • to allow for the surrender of illegal firearms under the amnesty.
  • to allow people who missed the cut off date for relicensing to license their weapons in terms of the Firearms Control Act (FCA).

The amnesty process should not be seen in isolation from our efforts to reduce the number of illegal firearms in circulation. It should be understood to be part of our holistic approach to reduce firearms in private hands and the resultant crime from the proliferation of these guns.

The current amnesty process is aimed at achieving the following:

  • Promoting responsible firearms ownership through the implementation of the Firearms Control Act (FCA).
  • The implementation of Integrated Ballistic Identification System (IBIS) testing of weapons. In particular state weapons and starting with SAPS members. This is aimed at ensuring greater accountability and responsibility over weapons in the hands of state officials and private security operators.
  • Initiatives by SAPS to remove weapons from the hands of criminals through focused police operations and investigations.
  • Addressing the pool of illegal weapons in circulation within the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. To this end we are planning to ensure that similar amnesty processes occur in other SADC countries starting in March this year.

Under the amnesty the following people are targeted:

  • Individuals who have knowledge of whereabouts of firearms and ammunition.
  • Individuals who inherited firearms and did not apply for a license.
  • Individuals who have legally sold or disposed of licensed firearm, but are still in possession of firearms parts or ammunition.
  • Manufacturers, gunsmiths and firearms dealers with surplus, obsolete and redundant firearms and ammunition.
  • Storage facilities where firearms and ammunition are stored.
  • Individuals who store firearms without legal authorization.
  • Private security companies with obsolete, redundant or surplus firearms.
  • The general public.

People who wish to make use of the amnesty process will surrender their weapons or apply for licensing through their local police stations. Each local station has been instructed to appoint a designated Firearm Amnesty Official/s who will be responsible for ensuring smooth running of the process at a local level. The Provincial and National Joint Operation Centres (JOC) will co-ordinate all operational aspects of the amnesty process.

The establishment and maintenance of an all-inclusive monitoring mechanism will play a pivotal role in the successful conclusion of Amnesty 2010. In relation to the issue of compensation, the Firearms Control Act, 2000, is clear about the circumstances under which compensation will and will not be paid.

Compensation is not payable where the firearms and ammunition was seized from a person to whom no license was issued, or the person was otherwise unlawfully in possession of the firearm. A lawful owner of a firearm also has no claim against a firearm if the South African Police Service (SAPS) recovered it after having been stolen from a lawful owner as a result of his or her negligence.

The Act also provides that no compensation is payable where firearms or ammunition are destroyed by the State.

A person who has had their license repealed under the old repealed Act, or who does not wish to retain their licensed firearm has a number of options open to them:

  • The person could choose to sell their firearm to a licensed person or a firearm dealership.
  • A person who wanted to keep firearms purely for sentimental reasons could apply for permission to de-activate a firearm and once permission is obtained, such de-activation has to be performed at their own expense.
  • They could choose to forfeit the firearm to the State for destruction and where the destruction costs are then borne by the State.

The choice on how to dispose of a firearm is therefore with the owner, as long as the conditions of the Firearms Control Act are adhered to as cited above.

There may be entities that will embark on a strategy to derail the amnesty processes. One of which is the discrediting of the safety of firearms in police custody and the amnesty processes as exemplified by the wild accusation made by the Gun Owners of South Africa (GOSA) last week Friday.

In order to address these allegations as well as to ensure public confidence in the process, we have established a comprehensive monitoring process to monitor the amnesty. A National Monitoring Team has been established under the Secretariat of Police and the provincial teams have been put in place and will report to this national team on all aspects of the process.

Vital to the success of the amnesty is an effective communication plan. Our communication plan has been up and running since 4 January 2010 and will continue until the end of April.

Our communication plan includes the following:

  • Informing the public about amnesty.
  • Communicating the period and conditions of the amnesty.
  • Promoting responsible firearm usage and compliance with the FCA.
  • Creating awareness in communities.
  • Enlisting the support of civil society in communicating the amnesty to the public.
  • Informing the public about steps being taken by government to address firearm related crimes.

We are encouraged by the support the amnesty has received from members of the public and organizations. Weapons have already started to be handed in at local stations around the country. Within two weeks of the launch more than 22 000 weapons and over 33 600 rounds of ammunition had been recovered. We wish to thank citizens who have heeded our call to rid our country of unwanted and illegal firearms by making use of both the amnesty of 2005 and the present amnesty.

Equally, we are encouraged by the support we have received from the business community, Gun Free South Africa and even from some of the Gun Owner Associations such as the South African Hunters and Game Conservation Association. We intend over the coming days and weeks to intensify our engagement with other organisations to ensure their support for this process.

It is important for us to explain to the South African public the reason that prompted us to declare this Amnesty. Amongst other factors is that South Africa has a significant pool of illegal firearms in circulation which contribute to the high rate of serious and violent crime as well as firearm-related crimes.

The source of these illegal firearms range from stolen firearms from licensed members of the public to firearms illegally smuggled into the country. It is therefore common in nature that they are owned illegally and the State has little or no knowledge of them.

The law enforcement agencies be it police, military, intelligence community are charged with the responsibility of uncovering illegal arsenals, tracking arms smuggling and uncovering illegal weapons syndicates. The success of any operation depends on the active participation of the ordinary citizens of our country.

It is indeed a duty of every South African patriot to report any criminal activity including the illegal possession and dealing in firearms and ammunition. As a government that cares, we understand that all our people irrespective of race, class, gender, or religion deserve to live in a secured and comfortable environment.

Working together with communities, the ANC government will ensure that criminals are dealt with to the full extent of the law. To fight crime, we need to stand together. We must build and strengthen partnerships, and work together to speed up effective service to the people in order to succeed in our objective of creating a united, non-racial, non-sexist, democratic, peaceful, secured and prosperous South Africa.

The journey that we have thus far travelled gives us confidence that we shall reach our goal of a society that is free from gun violence, a society that cares.

Awulethue umshini wakho. Surrender your firearm.

<<>

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

SHUKRANI
FAMILIA YA MAREHEMU ALHAJ RASHIDI MFAUME KAWAWA INATOA SHUKRANI ZA DHATI KWA MHE. JAKAYA MRISHO KIKWETE, RAIS WA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA; MHE. DKT. ALI MOHAMED SHEIN, MAKAMU WA RAIS WA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA; MHE. AMANI ABEID KARUME, RAIS WA SERIKALI YA MAPINDUZI ZANZIBAR; MHE. MIZENGO PETER PINDA , WAZIRI MKUU WA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA; CHAMA CHA MAPINDUZI, NDUGU GEORGE YAMBESI, KAIMU KATIBU MKUU KIONGOZI WA SERIKALI YA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA (MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI YA MAZISHI) NA WAJUMBE WAKE, WANANCHI WOTE WATANZANIA WALIOKO NDANI NA NJE YA NCHI, JAMII YA KIMATAIFA NDANI NA NJE YA NCHI, MADAKTARI NA WATUMISHI WOTE WA SEKTA YA AFYA WA NDANI NA NJE YA NCHI , VYOMBO VYA HABARI VYA NDANI NA NJE YA NCHI, VYOMBO VYA ULINZI NA USALAMA, MASHEIKH, MADHEHEBU MENGINE YOTE YA DINI NA VYAMA VYOTE VYA SIASA VYA UPINZANI NCHINI KWA MISAADA NA HUDUMA MBALIMBALI YA HALI NA MALI WALIYOITOA WAKATI WA KUMUUGUZA MZEE WAO MAREHEMU RASHIDI MFAUME KAWAWA HADI KIFO KILIPOMCHUKUA DISEMBA 31, 2009 KATIKA HOSPITALI YA TAIFA YA MUHIMBILI NA WAKATI WA MAZISHI YAKE YALIYOFANYIKA KWA HESHIMA ZOTE JANUARI 2, 2010 MADALE, DAR ES SALAAM.
SI RAHISI KUTAJA MAJINA YA WOTE WALIOWAFARIJI WAKATI WA MSIBA WA MZEE WAO ILA FAMILIA INATOA SHUKRANI ZAKE ZA DHATI KUPITIA SALAMU HIZI KWA KILA MMOJA WENU ALIYESHIRIKI KWA NAMNA MOJA AU NYINGINE KUWAFARIJI WAKATI WA MSIBA MKUBWA WA MZEE WAO.
FAMILIA INAWAKARIBISHA WOTE KATIKA HITMA/AROBAINI YA MAREHEMU MZEE RASHIDI MFAUME KAWAWA ITAKAYOFANYIKA JUMAMOSI TAREHE 6 FEBRUARI 2010 SAA 7 MCHANA NYUMBANI KWAKE MADALE, DAR ES SALAAM.
MUNGU AILAZE ROHO YA MAREHEMU MAHALI PEMA PEPONI, AMIN.
INNAH LILLAH WA INNA ILLAHI RAJJIUN.



Former Prime Minister Tony Blair appeared in front of the Iraq inquiry to answer questions about his decision to take the UK to war against Iraq.Below was the scene outside

ANALYSIS - BY IAIN WATSON
Overall, Tony Blair gave an assured performance. He wriggled a bit when asked not about what he had said to previous Iraq inquiries, but what he had said to daytime TV presenter Fern Britton.With no WMDs discovered, Mr Blair went out of his way to point to Saddam's lack of co-operation in coming clean about his weapons, or lack of them - which meant that Saddam was in "material breach" of his obligations to the UN.
But his main argument was that, actually, decisions weren't based on absolutes but on "the calculus of risk". In the more uncertain world after 9/11 it was simply too risky not take action against a dictator who had used chemical weapons on his own people.


Protocols
The following are protocols used in the inquiry for:
witnesses giving evidence to the Iraq Inquiry
hearing evidence by the Iraq Inquiry in public
sensitive information



Statements
Opening statement by Sir John Chilcot at Iraq Inquiry launch
Statement by Sir John Chilcot about the first set of public hearings
Sir John Chilcot's closing statement, 17 December 2009





Biographies of the Iraq Inquiry members
Sir John Chilcot (Chairman)
Sir Lawrence Freedman
Sir Martin Gilbert
Sir Roderic Lyne
Baroness Usha Prashar




Relevant documents
Letter from Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman to Sir John Chilcot dated 18 January 2010 [PDF 150KB, 1 page]
Memo from Professor Sir Lawrence Freedman to Jonathan Powell, 16 April 1999 [PDF 33KB, 5 pages]
Letter from the Prime Minister to Sir John Chilcot dated 17 June 2009 [PDF 53KB, 2 pages]
Letter from Sir John Chilcot to the Prime Minister dated 21 June 2009 [PDF 611KB, 2 pages]
Letter from the Prime Minister to Sir John Chilcot dated 22 June 2009 [PDF 53KB, 2 pages]
Letter from the Prime Minister to Sir John Chilcot dated 19 January 2010 [PDF 26KB, 1 page]
Letter from Sir John Chilcot to the Prime Minister dated 21 January 2010 [PDF 344KB, 2 pages]
Letter from the Prime Minister to Sir John Chilcot dated 22 January 2010 [PDF 90KB, 1 page]



For those who do have a ticket we advise you to plan your journey to arrive at the QEII Centre in good time for the hearing. The Inquiry recommends that you use the entrance to the QEII Centre located on Storey’s Gate. A map of the Centre’s location can be found here





For more information, please click on the links below:
Hearings Timetables
Public Access to the Hearings
Ballot Access to the Hearings - Tony Blair
Evidence

Source BBC,IRAQ ENQUIRY

PHOTOS:Ayoub mzee






Monday, 1 February 2010

Nigerians in Diaspora Organization Europe (NIDOE) is the European arm of a global Nigerian Diaspora network farewell Party for Diplomat Zakari Garba-'Man of the People' who was Head Immmigration at the Nigeria High commission -London


The deputy High commissioner making a key note speech at the function


Mr Zakari Garba and his wifeThe Host Dr Alistair Soyode -President of NIDOE
The Deputy High commissioner with some guests



Even at the the event ,Mr Zakari had time for a one to one


The leader of CANUK-The Central Association of Nigerians in the United Kingdom was also present at the event

The chairman of the Nigeria ruling Party PDP -UK chapter was also present to say bye.In the meantime you can reach PDP at secretariat@pdpukchapter.org. They are looking forward to hearing from you.

guests at the event


Mr Emmersion and Miski also graced the occassion





























Saturday, 30 January 2010

Students and Community Organizers Launch the 2010 Break The Silence Speakers Tour at The University of Chicago
Student leaders and community organizers have responded to the silence surrounding the suffering and injustices in the Congo by organizing to Break the Silence and mobilize for change in solidarity with the people of the Congo. Friends of the Congo launches its annual Break the Silence Speakers Tour (February – July 2010) today at the University of Chicago with the following program:
Complicit Destruction: Money Mines and Militarization in the Democratic Republic of Congo
A panel discussion and film screening presented by Chicago Society and the African and Caribbean Students' Association with Global Voices and the University of Chicago International House.
Guest Speakers:Maurice Carney Co-Founder and Executive Director of Friends of the Congo
Dr. Justine Nzeba Former regional director for Central Africa, American Friends Service Committee and Editorial board member of The Great Lakes Research Journal
Kambale Musavuli Student coordinator of the International Break the Silence/Congo Week Campaign
Emilie Ngo-Nguidjol Community activist and founder of AFRICaide
Gilbert Mulamba Community activist and documentarian of "The Street Children of Kinshasa"
Moderator:Kisuule Magala Katende Voice of "ear to the Ground" on Chicago Public Radio
Who: Friends of the Congo in collaboration with student organizations at the University of Chicago.
What: Launch of the Break the Silence Speakers Tour (February – July 2010)
When: 6 pm – 9 pm, Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Where: University of ChicagoInternational House Assembly Hall1414 East 59th StreetChicago, IL 60637

Friday, 29 January 2010

SUMMARY OF THE LONDON AFGHANSTAN SUMMIT
Handover security duties in Afghan provinces starting in late 2010 or early 2011


Funds to reintegrate Taliban who cut ties with al-Qaeda
Hold a 2010 summit in Kabul to develop concrete plans for the Afghan government programme



Backs start of discussions on a new Afghan-led IMF programme

Afghan military strength to 171,600 and police numbers to 134,000 by October 2011
Karzai pays tribute to UK troops
Will the Taliban talk to Karzai?








Tom Sizemore, M.D.
Principal Deputy Director
For Preparedness and Emergency Operations
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Peter Bloland
Associate Director for Science and Programs
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Press Conference

Haiti



Mr. Duguid: Welcome ladies and gentlemen. We are in the U.S. Joint Information Center in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Today with us are Mr. Tom Sizemore, the Principal Deputy Director for Preparedness and Emergency Operations at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accompanying him is Mr. Peter Bloland, the Associate Director for Science and Programs at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Our guests will talk to you about the current health situation in Haiti. They’ll begin with a few remarks and then we’ll go to your questions.Dr. Sizemore: Thank you very much for being on this call today. It’s important that the long process of recovery remains visible to the public. Especially to the millions of Americans who through their contributions of money, time, and sympathy, are part of this effort.
As you know, the United Nations, working with the Haitian government and its international partners, our efforts to coordinate effectively have produced a very strong collaboration. It’s our shared goal to alleviate the suffering of the earthquake survivors as much as we can, as fast as possible. And in the days following the quake the focus was on responding to the acute emergency needs and that still continues. Now we’re taking the steps to address the emerging health risk of the population including some million people who have been made homeless by the quake including tens of thousands of people crowded together and living under plastic sheets.
Yesterday the international teams began doing rapid assessments. These assessments will give us a picture of health, nutrition, and shelter of survivors across the country. Today we’re rolling out a general surveillance tool. Whereas the rapid assessment will give us a snapshot of a broad range of indicators, the surveillance system is being deployed and will give us a moving picture of the health threats as they emerge over time. Based on the information collected by the rapid assessments and the general surveillance tool, we’ll be better able to use our resources more effectively.
While the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services still has almost 300 doctors and nurses and support staff in six different locations seen, as of yesterday, over 11,600 different human contacts, different nations, men, women and children we are continuing to evaluate and treat.
The rapid assessments and the surveillance tool provide the first steps in rebuilding Haiti’s public health infrastructure.
Finally, while I’m extremely proud of all the work Americans are doing here, I want to remind you that this is an international collaboration with the government of Haiti.
Thank you again for being on this call today.
Mr. Duguid: Thank you, Dr. Sizemore.
Dr. Bloland, would you like to say a few opening remarks?
Dr. Bloland: We’ve been working very hard, as Dr. Sizemore mentioned, to stand up and implement a public health surveillance system. The surveillance system is really designed to do a couple of major things. The first thing is to give us the ability to rapidly detect the emergence of potential outbreaks of infectious disease that might arise from the breakdown of the public health system here in Haiti and the crowding that has occurred as populations have left their homes or lost their homes and moved to temporary shelters.
The second part of that public health surveillance system is really trying to get a sense of the impact of the earthquake. We’ll go on to continue to collect information about trauma cases and complications of trauma cases.
The third little component is really to try and assess the impact of the earthquake on provisions of ongoing services to chronically ill patients. Things like chronic heart disease, TB, tuberculosis treatment, and treatment for HIV. We hope together these things will not only give us a sense of the impact for planning purposes, but also allow us to have the ability to detect new disease outbreaks and deal with them rapidly and try to limit their impact.
Mr. Duguid: Thank you, gentlemen. We are now ready to take your questions.
Question: [Jeff Schuegel, Stars and Stripes].
I’m wondering, with the combination of dead bodies and tropical heat, what is the possibility of a cholera epidemic?
Dr. Bloland: I think the evidence from past situations where there have been mass casualties has been that it’s very very rare for diseased people, dead bodies in the street or community, to spread disease or be the source of outbreaks. So we’re less concerned about that and more concerned about the social and cultural implications and trying to get families to have the remains of their family members interned in a respectful fashion.
Question: [Carol Rosenberg, Miami Herald Newspaper].
Doctors, thank you for taking the call. What kind of diseases are you seeing so far? And do you have any kind of status update on what’s going on with the orphans?
Dr. Sizemore: I’ll go ahead and start with that, with regard to some of the trauma. As you might expect, the initial results of the earthquake resulted in a lot of crush trauma, broken bones, compound fractures, contusions, concussions, internal abdominal injuries. With regard to diseases, infectious diseases and so forth, I’ll turn to my collaborator here.
Dr. Bloland: Before the earthquake Haiti certainly had its public health challenges. Things like malaria, deng deng, respiratory disease, diarrheal disease. A number of different vector borne diseases that really caused them some difficulties in terms of providing care, keeping their population healthy. That hasn’t changed because of the earthquake. What has changed is really the disruption of the health care system, the healthy provision system, an interruption of the type of services one would hope would be available to recognize when people are sick, and particularly if it’s affecting a large number of people.So we expect there would continue to be the problems that Haiti has always had, the same list of diseases that I mentioned before. But I think what we need to do now is get a system that can rapidly identify outbreaks should they occur. Because people have congregated in fairly large temporary communities that don’t have the kinds of services to provide clean water and sanitation and because of the crowding that’s occurring, we need to be very vigilant about things such as respiratory disease and diarrheal disease. Really, those are the types of things that we’re most focused on because those can crop up very rapidly, affect a large number of people, particularly in a crowded situation.
Question: [Miriam Falco, CNN].
You said hundreds of thousands of people living outside or in what’s called a tent, but is a blanket and a branch. You haven’t had any rain in Haiti yet, but that is surely to come. How are you going to deal with that? What are the chances of more disease spreading once you’ve got water on top of close quarters, lots of people, and you mentioned no sanitation and fresh water, et cetera. How concerned are you about that?
Dr. Bloland: I think we’re very concerned. Certainly heavy rains will not improve the situation by any means. But I think part of what the rapid assessments are aiming to do is to really get a good sense on what shelter is out there, what the needs are. That’s going to be an essential planning tool, to try to understand how best to serve the needs of the population.As you can imagine, many of these people have lost their homes, many are afraid to go back because of the earthquake and the impact that they’ve seen. So we have to be sensitive of this, what it appears they might have, or their situation. I think it’s going to be important to try and understand what services are needed and to plan very carefully how to provide them so that the impact of rains that might come and the sanitation concerns and so forth will be met by the Ministry of Health and other partners.
Question: But if you wait for the assessment, won’t the tents or whatever you can provide come too late?
Dr. Bloland: Assessments will be done in the next couple of days. The rains aren’t expected for a few more weeks and months. So we are under a tight line and we’re certainly going to, the international community is certainly going to try and meet those challenges. But I think the combination of understanding what the needs are, getting the international community to help the Haitian government to meet those needs, and setting up systems to recognize when something bad is happening as rapidly as possible, those things together will help us address the challenge.
Question: [Steven Smith, Boston Globe].
Good afternoon. Thank you for taking the call.
What I have heard from field hospital doctors is that they have seen this pattern emerge where the first few days they were encountering Haitians who had various injuries and complications directly related to the earthquake. What they have begun seeing in more recent days are wounds that have become infected because of the inability to keep them clean, cases of tetanus in some closed wounds, rashes, GI illness. I’m wondering in that regard if you are hearing similar things and what you make of that.
Dr. Sizemore: That’s a great question and a good point. What we do see in fact, as I said earlier, initially were the injuries, and now the number of new injuries ahs leveled off. We are seeing infections from sound care problems and so forth.
With regard to tetanus and things that can be prevented by immunizations, the government of Haiti has announced an immunization program starting up pretty soon. I’ll turn to Captain Bloland here and let him talk a little bit more about that if he would please.
Dr. Bloland: I think what is currently being proposed by the Ministry of Health and its partners are really to look at what vaccinations might make sense in the current situation. The types of things they’re considering would be the normal childhood vaccinations, Diphtheria and other things that might pose a problem, particularly in this kind of setting. So they are working with their partners to try and understand how to put together the kinds of evacuation campaigns that will be necessary to get this out to the communities as rapidly as possible.
Operator: I’m not showing any further questions from the phone at this time.
Mr. Duguid: If someone would like to pose a follow-up question, we’re ready to answer those. If not, we thank everyone for their time.
Thank you for your time in dialing in, and we wish you well and goodbye from the U.S. Joint Information Center in Port-au-Prince Haiti.
# # # #

Thursday, 28 January 2010




THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release January 27, 2010


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
IN STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS

U.S. Capitol


9:11 P.M. EST


THE PRESIDENT: Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For 220 years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They've done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they've done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.

It's tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable -– that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run, and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday, and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were the times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements, our hesitations and our fears, America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, as one people.

Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history's call.

One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by a severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted -– immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

But the devastation remains. One in 10 Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. And for those who'd already known poverty, life has become that much harder.

This recession has also compounded the burdens that America's families have been dealing with for decades –- the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.

So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They're not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for President. These struggles are what I've witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana; Galesburg, Illinois. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children -– asking why they have to move from their home, asking when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.

For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded, but hard work on Main Street isn't; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They're tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can't afford it. Not now.

So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope -– what they deserve -– is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories, different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared: a job that pays the bills; a chance to get ahead; most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.

You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching Little League and helping their neighbors. One woman wrote to me and said, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."

It's because of this spirit -– this great decency and great strength -– that I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight. (Applause.) Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength. (Applause.)
And tonight, tonight I'd like to talk about how together we can deliver on that promise.

It begins with our economy.

Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, and everybody in between, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it -- (applause.) I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal. (Laughter.)

But when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn't just do what was popular -– I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.

So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable. And as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we've recovered most of the money we spent on the banks. (Applause.) Most but not all.

To recover the rest, I've proposed a fee on the biggest banks. (Applause.) Now, I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea. But if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need. (Applause.)

Now, as we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed.

That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.

Now, let me repeat: We cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. (Applause.) We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. (Applause.)

I thought I'd get some applause on that one. (Laughter and applause.)

As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas and food and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime. (Applause.)

Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. (Applause.) Two hundred thousand work in construction and clean energy; 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, first responders. (Applause.) And we're on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.

The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. (Applause.) That's right -– the Recovery Act, also known as the stimulus bill. (Applause.) Economists on the left and the right say this bill has helped save jobs and avert disaster. But you don't have to take their word for it. Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act. Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created. Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn't be laid off after all.

There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.

But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our number-one focus in 2010, and that's why I'm calling for a new jobs bill tonight. (Applause.)

Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses. (Applause.) But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.

We should start where most new jobs do –- in small businesses, companies that begin when -- (applause) -- companies that begin when an entrepreneur -- when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides it's time she became her own boss. Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and they're ready to grow. But when you talk to small businessowners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania, or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they're mostly lending to bigger companies. Financing remains difficult for small businessowners across the country, even those that are making a profit.

So tonight, I'm proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. (Applause.) I'm also proposing a new small business tax credit
-– one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. (Applause.) While we're at it, let's also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all large businesses and all small businesses to invest in new plants and equipment. (Applause.)

Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. (Applause.) From the first railroads to the Interstate Highway System, our nation has always been built to compete. There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.

Tomorrow, I'll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. (Applause.) There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help move our nation's goods, services, and information. (Applause.)

We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities -- (applause) -- and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. (Applause.) And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America. (Applause.)

Now, the House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. (Applause.) As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same, and I know they will. (Applause.) They will. (Applause.) People are out of work. They're hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay. (Applause.)

But the truth is, these steps won't make up for the seven million jobs that we've lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.

We can't afford another so-called economic "expansion" like the one from the last decade –- what some call the "lost decade" -– where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.

From the day I took office, I've been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious; such an effort would be too contentious. I've been told that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for a while.

For those who make these claims, I have one simple question: How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold? (Applause.)

You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China is not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany is not waiting. India is not waiting. These nations -- they're not standing still. These nations aren't playing for second place. They're putting more emphasis on math and science. They're rebuilding their infrastructure. They're making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs. Well, I do not accept second place for the United States of America. (Applause.)

As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may become, it's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.

Now, one place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks. I'm interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.

We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. (Applause.) We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.

Now, the House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. (Applause.) And the lobbyists are trying to kill it. But we cannot let them win this fight. (Applause.) And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back until we get it right. We've got to get it right. (Applause.)

Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history -– (applause) -- an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investments in clean energy -– in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.

But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. (Applause.) It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. (Applause.) It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. (Applause.) And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America. (Applause.)

I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. (Applause.) And this year I'm eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. (Applause.)

I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy. I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But here's the thing -- even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future -– because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation. (Applause.)

Third, we need to export more of our goods. (Applause.) Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. (Applause.) So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America. (Applause.) To help meet this goal, we're launching a National Export Initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security. (Applause.)

We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are. If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores. (Applause.) But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules. (Applause.) And that's why we'll continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea and Panama and Colombia. (Applause.)

Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people. (Applause.)

Now, this year, we've broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. And the idea here is simple: Instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform -- reform that raises student achievement; inspires students to excel in math and science; and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to the inner city. In the 21st century, the best anti-poverty program around is a world-class education. (Applause.) And in this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than on their potential.

When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all 50 states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. That's why I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families. (Applause.)

To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that go to banks for student loans. (Applause.) Instead, let's take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. (Applause.) And let's tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only 10 percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after 20 years –- and forgiven after 10 years if they choose a career in public service, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college. (Applause.)

And by the way, it's time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs -– (applause) -- because they, too, have a responsibility to help solve this problem.

Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle class. That's why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on middle-class families. That's why we're nearly doubling the child care tax credit, and making it easier to save for retirement by giving access to every worker a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg. That's why we're working to lift the value of a family's single largest investment –- their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments.

This year, we will step up refinancing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages. (Applause.) And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform. (Applause.) Yes, we do. (Applause.)

Now, let's clear a few things up. (Laughter.) I didn't choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn't take on health care because it was good politics. (Laughter.) I took on health care because of the stories I've heard from Americans with preexisting conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who've been denied coverage; families –- even those with insurance -– who are just one illness away from financial ruin.

After nearly a century of trying -- Democratic administrations, Republican administrations -- we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we've taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care.

And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make kids healthier. (Applause.) Thank you. She gets embarrassed. (Laughter.)

Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office -– the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress –- our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades. (Applause.)

Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, the process left most Americans wondering, "What's in it for me?"

But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I'm finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber. (Applause.)

So, as temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we've proposed. There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. (Applause.) Let me know. Let me know. (Applause.) I'm eager to see it.

Here's what I ask Congress, though: Don't walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people. (Applause.) Let's get it done. Let's get it done. (Applause.)

Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it's not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It's a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that's been subject to a lot of political posturing. So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight.

At the beginning of the last decade, the year 2000, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. (Applause.) By the time I took office, we had a one-year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. All this was before I walked in the door. (Laughter and applause.)

Now -- just stating the facts. Now, if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit. But we took office amid a crisis. And our efforts to prevent a second depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt. That, too, is a fact.

I'm absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do. But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the same. (Applause.) So tonight, I'm proposing specific steps to pay for the trillion dollars that it took to rescue the economy last year.

Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. (Applause.) Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will. (Applause.)

We will continue to go through the budget, line by line, page by page, to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work. We've already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we'll extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, for investment fund managers, and for those making over $250,000 a year. We just can't afford it. (Applause.)

Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we'll still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That's why I've called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. (Applause.) This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline.

Now, yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I'll issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans. (Applause.) And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason for why we had record surpluses in the 1990s. (Applause.)

Now, I know that some in my own party will argue that we can't address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. And I agree -- which is why this freeze won't take effect until next year -- (laughter) -- when the economy is stronger. That's how budgeting works. (Laughter and applause.) But understand –- understand if we don't take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery -– all of which would have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.

From some on the right, I expect we'll hear a different argument -– that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts including those for the wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is that's what we did for eight years. (Applause.) That's what helped us into this crisis. It's what helped lead to these deficits. We can't do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let's try common sense. (Laughter.) A novel concept.

To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust -– deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue -- to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve. (Applause.)

That's what I came to Washington to do. That's why -– for the first time in history –- my administration posts on our White House visitors online. That's why we've excluded lobbyists from policymaking jobs, or seats on federal boards and commissions.

But we can't stop there. It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my administration or with Congress. It's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office.

With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests –- including foreign corporations –- to spend without limit in our elections. (Applause.) I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. (Applause.) They should be decided by the American people. And I'd urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to correct some of these problems.

I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. (Applause.) Democrats and Republicans. You've trimmed some of this spending, you've embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. (Applause.) Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single Web site before there's a vote, so that the American people can see how their money is being spent. (Applause.)

Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don't also reform how we work with one another. Now, I'm not naïve. I never thought that the mere fact of my election would usher in peace and harmony -- (laughter) -- and some post-partisan era. I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched. And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, they've been taking place for over 200 years. They're the very essence of our democracy.

But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We can't wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about the other side -– a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of -- (applause) -- I'm speaking to both parties now. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants shouldn't be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual senators. (Applause.)

Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, no matter how malicious, is just part of the game. But it's precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people. Worse yet, it's sowing further division among our citizens, further distrust in our government.

So, no, I will not give up on trying to change the tone of our politics. I know it's an election year. And after last week, it's clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual. But we still need to govern.

To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve problems, not run for the hills. (Applause.) And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that 60 votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town -- a supermajority -- then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. (Applause.) Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. (Applause.) So let's show the American people that we can do it together. (Applause.)

This week, I'll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans. I'd like to begin monthly meetings with both Democratic and Republican leadership. I know you can't wait. (Laughter.)

Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security. Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated. We can argue all we want about who's to blame for this, but I'm not interested in re-litigating the past. I know that all of us love this country. All of us are committed to its defense. So let's put aside the schoolyard taunts about who's tough. Let's reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values. Let's leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future -- for America and for the world. (Applause.)

That's the work we began last year. Since the day I took office, we've renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We've made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives. We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security and swifter action on our intelligence. We've prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula. And in the last year, hundreds of al Qaeda's fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed -- far more than in 2008.

And in Afghanistan, we're increasing our troops and training Afghan security forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. (Applause.) We will reward good governance, work to reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans -- men and women alike. (Applause.) We're joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitments, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am absolutely confident we will succeed.

As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August. (Applause.) We will support the Iraqi government -- we will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and we will continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity. But make no mistake: This war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home. (Applause.)

Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform -- in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and around the world –- they have to know that we -- that they have our respect, our gratitude, our full support. And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home. (Applause.) That's why we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades -- last year. (Applause.) That's why we're building a 21st century VA. And that's why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families. (Applause.)

Now, even as we prosecute two wars, we're also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people -– the threat of nuclear weapons. I've embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons and seeks a world without them. To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades. (Applause.) And at April's Nuclear Security Summit, we will bring 44 nations together here in Washington, D.C. behind a clear goal: securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists. (Applause.)

Now, these diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of nuclear weapons. That's why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions –- sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. That's why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated. And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise. (Applause.)

That's the leadership that we are providing –- engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We're working through the G20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We're working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We're helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease -– a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad.

As we have for over 60 years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores. But we also do it because it is right. That's why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild. (Applause.) That's why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; why we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; why we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea. For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity. (Applause.) Always. (Applause.)

Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we're all created equal; that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.

We must continually renew this promise. My administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. (Applause.) We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. (Applause.) This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. (Applause.) It's the right thing to do. (Applause.)

We're going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws -– so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work. (Applause.) And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system -– to secure our borders and enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nation. (Applause.)

In the end, it's our ideals, our values that built America -- values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe; values that drive our citizens still. Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers. Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country. They take pride in their labor, and are generous in spirit. These aren't Republican values or Democratic values that they're living by; business values or labor values. They're American values.

Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions -– our corporations, our media, and, yes, our government –- still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates to silly arguments, big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.

No wonder there's so much cynicism out there. No wonder there's so much disappointment.

I campaigned on the promise of change –- change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren't sure if they still believe we can change –- or that I can deliver it.

But remember this –- I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I could do it alone. Democracy in a nation of 300 million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That's just how it is.

Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths and pointing fingers. We can do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation.

But I also know this: If people had made that decision 50 years ago, or 100 years ago, or 200 years ago, we wouldn't be here tonight. The only reason we are here is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and their grandchildren.

Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going -– what keeps me fighting -– is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism, that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people, that lives on.

It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, "None of us," he said, "…are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail."

It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, "We are strong. We are resilient. We are American."

It lives on in the 8-year-old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti.

And it lives on in all the Americans who've dropped everything to go someplace they've never been and pull people they've never known from the rubble, prompting chants of "U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A!" when another life was saved.

The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people. We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don't quit. I don't quit. (Applause.) Let's seize this moment -- to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more. (Applause.)

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

END 10:20 P.M. EST

Monday, 25 January 2010

Ayoub mzee with Birtish actor Kwame
Kwame was Writer in Residence at the Bristol Old Vic 1999-2001 where he wrote three plays - A Bitter Herb (Winner Peggy Ramsey award), Blues Brother Soul Sister, and Big Nose. He is currently Writer in Residence for BBC Radio drama, an Associate Artist at the National Theatre of Gt. Britain, Centerstage Baltimore and Congo Square theatre company Chicago USA.
His triptych of plays set in the habits of the African Caribbean community - Elmina’s Kitchen - Fix Up and Statement of Regret premiered at the National Theatre between 2003- 2007, with Elmina’s Kitchen transferring to the London’s West End, (The First African Caribbean playwright to have had that honour ) Baltimore and Chicago. Amongst others he has won the Evening Standard Charles Wintor Award for Most Promising Playwright, Screen Nation Award for Favourite TV Actor, 100 Black Men of Britain PublicFigure Award, GPA Man of the Year and The RECON Community Leadership award 2007.
Kwame has been nominated for a Lawrence Oliver Award and a BAFTA. He received an Honorary Doctorate from The Open University in 2008. Kwame made his directorial debut at Baltimore’s Centerstage directing the Macarther award winning playwright Naomi Wallace’s Things of Dry Hours in early 2007. He then went on to direct the Pultizer nominated playwright Esa Davis’s Ten minute play Dave Chappelle Was Right for the 24hr plays on Broadway and has recently completed directing his own play - Let There Be Love at the Tricycle Theatre London. Kwame has presented Newsnight Review and the Culture Show, has been a panellist on Question Time and Newsnight Review, and is often heard on BBC Radio 4. He was a regular columnist for The Guardian (2005-6) and has written articles for The Independent, The Telegraph, The Evening Standard, the New Statesmen and The Observer.
Kwame has been the Good Will ambassador for Trade for Christian Aid 2003- . He is a Governor at The University of the Arts London - A trustee of The Roundhouse, The National Theatre and the Tricycle Theatre and LEAP, a local employment charity focussing on getting the long term unemployed back into employment. As an actor Kwame played Finley Newton in the BBC’s Casualty 1999-2004 has recently been seen in the TV series Hotel Babylon , ITV’s LEWIS and the film Fade to Black.

HAVE YOU BEEN AT THE NEW SQUIRES AFRICAN RESTAURANT IN EAST HAM


E









Sunday, 24 January 2010

voting for our tomorrow-Operation Black Vote


LEE JUSPER
Positive thinking will take Britain to its’ “Yes We Can” moment, says Lee Jasper
When I was struggling at that time to shine a great light on a huge injustice, three black men in Cardiff were found guilty of murdering a white woman a crime they could not have committed, I invited the Rev Al Sharpton to the UK so that I could take him to Cardiff and get some publicity for this case.
Being the activist he is he came and he set the UK alight. The headlines on the day he landed were “Race Hate Preacher from Hell flies into UK.” Well, one mans hell is another mans heaven! Such was the publicity he brought to that case that the campaign became a national cause célèbre. Five years later the Cardiff three were freed.
SIMON WOOLEY
Since then we have watched each other from each side of the pond remaining good friends and I have seen him go through good times and bad with an undimmed commitment and when I have endured the vicious racism of a high tech media lynching it was his example that inspired me.
You see, if you’re going to be a fighter for justice you have to get into the ring, you have to get bloody, you will have to endure scars to you reputation and withstand false and malicious testimony.
So if I stand before you today if my political face looks scared and bloody, you need to know that these are the honor scars of a black power fighter. I bear my tribulation with pride and I am honored to be hated by the right wing press and media. I thank those of you who supported me from the bottom of my heart.
As we celebrate the birthday of Dr King we should take the time to reflect on his ideal of a post racist society as an objective that we are capable of delivering

REV ALSHARPTON
Whilst we marveled at the election of President Barack Obama, the big question for us in the UK is, could such a thing happen here? I have always been an optimist and I truly believe that we are destined to write our own page in history.
We here in the UK will arrive at our “Yes We Can” moment in history, but we have to be positive. The positive thinker sees the invisible, feels the intangible, and achieves the impossible.
Be under no illusion this election could provide the first step toward that destiny by ensuring the highest level of voter registration within our communities, in British political history.
As we push on into the 21st Century let us do so with our heads held high, in confident fashion having established ourselves as an electoral force to be reckoned with. And as with anything else in life, if we want to fly high and soar on the wings of confident optimism, it is our attitude not our aptitude that will.
Put simply, we want you to be revolutionary about registration, evangelical about the election and determined about democracy.
We want you to become, like Dr King a passionate advocate for justice. We want you to become a volatile voter, a civically militant electorate.
To those who turn away from the ballot box favoring a conscious ‘opt out’ from the democratic process and then complain about their lot, I say think again. Your non-voting quasi ‘revolutionary’ disengagement has failed. And to those who simply cannot be bothered, I say to you there is no such thing as not voting.
Those who do not vote elect bad politicians. By choosing to opt out you give your vote to maintaining the status quo. You are voting for the maintenance of racism and discrimination, you are voting for failing schools, you are voting for stop and search, you are voting for keeping Africa and the Caribbean in debt, you are voting to ensure that the people of Haiti never get the scale of help they urgently need and richly deserve.
You’ve got to be a chump not to vote! Not only is not voting self defeating it a betrayal of our history and it spits in the face of those like Dr King and many others who died securing our right to vote. It dances on the graves of Harriet Tubman and Rosa Parks.
The vote is the instrument and the symbol of a free man’s power to take the present and turn it into the future. Non-voting is a fundamental betrayal of our historic struggle for freedom and justice.
Any one that does not vote is not only a chump, but you’re also a traitor to your race. You have become part of the problem. And there is a lot we should be voting on.
Our parents believed it was their responsibility to beat down racism so that we, their children would enjoy greater opportunities than they enjoyed. This was their priority their raison d’être to make a life better for themselves and their children.
That’s what propelled them to leave their countries of origin and come to Britain. This generation may betray that legacy and we are in danger of abdicating our responsibility as parents, bequeathing to our children lesser opportunities than we enjoyed. This is something our children and grandchildren will not forgive or forget


Inaction is not an option; non-voting is not an option. Malcolm X my political mentor said this talking to a group of students said the following;
Look at yourselves. Some of you teenagers, students. How do you think I feel and I belong to a generation ahead of you – how do you think I feel to have to tell you, “We, my generation, sat around like a knot on a wall while the whole world was fighting for its human rights – and you’ve got to be born into a society where you still have that same fight.”
Today the issues facing us are a legion. From the moment of conception if you’re black in Britain you’re at a disadvantage. Figures show that Pakistan, African and Caribbean women experience significantly higher levels of infant mortality.
For Pakistani mothers the data shows 8.6 deaths per 1000 live births and for Caribbean mothers the figure stands at 10.7, this compared with the average mortality rate of 4.9 per 1000 live births immediately points to a glaring disproportion.
In the current recession we have seen black youth unemployment increase from 35% to 48%, that’s half our young people right there who are out of work and immersed in poverty.
We have more black men in jail than university and a serious problem of extreme violence among our young people. And we are our own principle victims of crime. We have high and increasing levels of teenage pregnancies and babies without fathers. We have poverty at home and are up to our necks in an illegal war abroad.
Racism requires double standards to exist and we should not buy into that mindset. You saw in Hurricane Katrina what you’re about to see in Haiti, international press straining at the leash to describe a proud people driven to absolute desperation as “violent looters” so that they can then walk away and blame the Haitians.
The earthquake caused a hell of a lot of damage but that is nothing compared to the damage caused by the world’s criminal neglect of Haiti. The world’s first Black republic has been punished ever since the day it became independent. Haiti is not poor Haitians have had poverty imposed upon them.
That double standard informs our everyday reality, it’s the stereotype that says all black men are pimps, that black boys are inherently violent and deserve exclusion from school, that black students are unintelligent. Yet when we gain our degrees we are overly unemployed as university graduates.
If we do have a job, it’s to fill quotas and if we don’t we are benefit scroungers. Those in work are first to be sacked and last to be promoted. We are underrepresented in Parliament and over represented in prison and psychiatric wards.
If we complain we are militants playing the race card and if we don’t it is evidence that there is not a problem. When we demand equality we are really talking about special treatment and if we wear a headscarf we are oppressed. If our friends are all black were self segregating and when we move into white areas were spoiling the neighborhood.
This is the reality of racism. Now as crazy as things are here we are fortunate because we have an opportunity to do something about it. We can help our children realise a better future. We can ensure that international aid from Britain comes with no strings attached. We can determine the price Caribbean farmers are paid for their bananas.
We can prevent illegal wars and demand that we spend money on schools and tackling pensioner poverty rather than wars and banker bailouts. This is where our redemption lies in taking up the historic challenge to register our people to vote in unprecedented numbers.
We can change this society and we can write our own page in history, I say to you that we here in the UK have a duty to our own children as well as the rest of humanity. If you woke up this morning with more health than illness, you are more blessed than the millions who won’t survive the week.
If you have never experienced the horrifying danger of war or the loneliness of false imprisonment, the agony of torture or the pangs of starvation, you are ahead of 20 million people around the world.
If you attend a Church or a Mosque without fear of harassment, arrest, torture, or death, you are more blessed than almost three billion people in the world.
If you have food in your fridge, clothes on your back, a roof over your head and a place to sleep, you are richer than 75% of this world.
If you have money in the bank, in your wallet, and spare change in a dish someplace and enjoy more than two dollars a day you are among the top 8% of the worlds wealthy.
If you can read the literature we have provided tonight, you are more blessed than over two billion people in the world that cannot read anything at all.
Let us be thankful for what we have got and use it to reach down and pull our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters up out of the mire of oppression and discrimination. You change for only two reasons: 
 you learn enough that you want to, 
or you hurt enough that you have to. Either way change is coming to Britain.
Yesterday is not ours to recover, but tomorrow is ours to win or lose. Join us on this historic quest.
* This is a version of the speech Lee Jasper gave at the Realising The Dream rally last night, with Rev Al Sharpton