Saturday, 18 May 2013


DEATHS IN POLICE CUSTODY UPDATE

April 11, 2013 — News
Written by Harmit AthwalPaul Grant
Over the last few months, police officers have been arrested in connection with the deaths of Sean Rigg and Kingsley Burrell, while someone died after being detained under the Mental Health Act.
Sean Rigg
On 27 March 2013, three police officers were arrested in connection with their evidence at the inquest into the death of Sean Rigg who died on the floor of Brixton police station in August 2008. (Read an IRR News story: ‘Jury applauded for critical inquest verdict’.) A 50-year-old sergeant and 29-year-old constable were both arrested on suspicion of perjury and perverting the course of justice; and a 48-year-old retired police officer was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice.[1] The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has also initiated an investigation into the previous investigation of the death. This ‘external review’ of the investigation into Sean Rigg’s death, conducted by Dr Silvia Casale, aims to identify areas of improvement and is due to report in Spring 2013.[2]
The Metropolitan police has established the Independent Commission on Mental Health and Policing, chaired by Victor Adebowale, to see how, from the ‘last five years where someone with a mental health condition has either died or been seriously injured following contact with police’, the Met police responds to people with mental health conditions. It was due to report in February 2013 but has been delayed until this month.[3]
Kingsley Burrell
On 22 March 2013, four West Midlands police constables were arrested in connection with the death of Kingsley Burrell. The officers were held on suspicion of gross negligence, manslaughter and misconduct in a public office after they had refused to be interviewed by the IPCC a month earlier. The arrests came almost two years after the death. The 29-year-old had called for police assistance when he and his child felt threatened by a group of men in Birmingham. He was arrested and held at the Oleaster Mental Health Unit, Birmingham, under the Mental Health Act and then transferred to the Mary Seacole unit. Days later, police officers responded to reports of a disturbance at the unit where Kingsley was restrained, taken to Queen Elizabeth hospital and later discharged to the Oleaster Mental Unit. Here, according to the IPCC, he ‘suffered a serious medical condition’ and was taken back to the Queen Elizabeth hospital where he died on 31 March 2011.[4]
Kingsley Burrell’s family were finally allowed to hold his funeral in August 2013, almost eighteen months after his death, following protest marches that demanded answers from authorities about how he died.
Olaseni Lewis
In February 2013, the family of 23-year-old Olaseni Lewis were told the inquest into his death had been delayed for a second time as a result of ‘further material’ from the Health and Safety Executive which the Crown Prosecution Service has to consider first. Olaseni Lewis died in Mayday hospital, Croydon on 4 September 2010 after being restrained by up to eleven police officers at Bethlem Royal hospital. He had voluntarily sought help (with his family) at Croydon University hospital, was sent to the Maudsley hospital and then transferred to the Bethlem Royal hospital in Beckenham. Hours later his family were told an ‘incident’ had taken place and that he had been taken to the Mayday where he was on life support, where he died days later.[5]
Jonathan Andel Malia
On 17 January 2013, 24-year-old Jonathan Andel Malia from Birmingham died in Lister hospital, Stevenage, Hertfordshire after being transferred from the nearby Cygnet hospital. On 4 January, he had been sectioned after voluntarily attending Queen Elizabeth, Birmingham after suffering from depression. Days later he was transferred to Meadowcroft Psychiatric Unit and then to the Chamberlain Ward at the Cygnet hospital which is a ‘locked ward for men. It provides a safe environment for service users experiencing an acute episode of mental illness that requires assessment and stabilisation’.[6]
Related links

Friday, 17 May 2013

Commonwealth  games  2014


BHS Banner
Black History Studies presents the screening of
Assata Shakur 

Tuesday 14th May 2013
Assata Shakur Poster   
 
On 2 May 2013, the FBI placed Assata Shakur, now living in Cuba, on its
Most Wanted Terrorists list, the first ever women to be added to this list. This was the day after the State Department was due to release its list of terrorist countries from which Cuba was widely expected to be removed. Watch this video by Democracy Now!
Forty years earlier, on 2 May 1973, Black Panther activist Assata Olugbala Shakur (fsn) Joanne Deborah Chesimard, was pulled over by the New Jersey State Police, shot twice and then charged with murder of a police officer.

Assata spent six and a half years in prison under brutal circumstances before escaping out of the maximum security wing of the Clinton Correctional Facility for Women in New Jersey in 1979 and moving to Cuba.

This is an intensely personal and political interview with Assata that belies the fearsome image of Joanne Chesimard. With wit and candor, Assata Shakur
recounts the experiences that led her life of activism and portrays the strengths, weaknesses, and eventual demise of Black and White revolutionary groups at the hands of government officials through J. Edgar Hoover andCOINTELPRO

There will be a discussion after the screening.     

This event will take place on TUESDAY 14TH MAY 2013 from 7.00pm to 9.00pm. 

The event will be held at the PCS Headquarters (CLAPHAM JUNCTION),160 Falcon Road, Clapham Junction, London SW11 2LN, (3 minutes walk from Clapham Junction mainline station. Buses to the venue 35, 37, 39, 49, 77, 87, 156, 70, 219, 239, 295, 319, 337, 334, 345, C3, G1).

Doors open at 6.30pm. The documentary will start at 7pm sharp! Hot food will be on sale.  

There will be an admission charge of £5 per person. Children under 16 are free (ID required).

PLEASE ARRIVE AT LEAST 15 MINUTES EARLY.   

Places for the film screenings are limited so if you are interested in attending please reply as soon as possible to acknowledge your place. Places will be allocated on a first come first served basis, so don't delay. Please confirm via email info@blackhistorystudies.com how many of you will be attending this event. Please can you also notify any cancellations made after confirmation.


Assata Book

"I have declared war on the rich who prosper on our poverty, the politicians who lie to us with smiling faces and all the mindless, heartless robots who protect them and their property. I am a Black revolutionary, and, as such, I am a victim of all the wrath, hatred and slander that Amerika is capable of." - Assata Shakur, political exile, former member of the Black Liberation Army and the Black Panther Party



Regards,  

Charmaine Simpson 
Chief Executive Officer 
  
  
Black History Studies 
Educating the community to educate themselves
Tel/Fax: 0208 881 0660 
Mobile: 07951 234233
Email: info@blackhistorystudies.com   


Black History Studies Ltd is a company limited by guarantee (Company No. 6626747), incorporated in England and Wales has its registered office at PO Box 45189, London, N15 3XP.  

This e-mail together with any attachments transmitted with it is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient you are notified that any use of this e-mail is prohibited. Addressees should check this e-mail for viruses. Black History Studies Ltd take no responsibility regarding viruses in this e-mail.  
 

Thursday, 16 May 2013




AFRICAN UNION



UNION AFRICAINE

UNIÃO AFRICANA


Press Release N.53/2013


Investments in Post Harvest Loss strategies cardinal says AUC


Lusaka, Zambia, May 14, 2013–The AUC today said investments in agriculture should go beyond improving on-farm productivity to also address Post Harvest Loss (PHL) reduction strategies. 

drea PHL.JPG

Speaking during the African Union Commission, Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the Food Agricultural Organisation (FAO) regional engagement on post harvest loss management meeting, Dr. Janet Edeme said significant amounts of food are lost after harvest thereby exacerbating food insecurity on the continent.
She said an efficient post-harvest sector would not only improve food security, but would also provide significant multiplier effects that would in turn enhance supply chain efficiencies, generate rural income and create on and off farm employment.
‘’ Therefore investment in agriculture should go beyond improvements in on-farm productivity to also address the post harvest sector and complementary areas of agri-business and agro-industry, whose potential as engines of economic growth is widely acknowledged.’’ said Dr. Edeme.
Dr. Edeme further acknowledged the endorsement of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), as an African initiative to foster agricultural policy reform at country and regional levels to boost agricultural growth and productivity in Africa.
COMESA Assistant Secretary General for Administration and Finance, Ambassador Nagla El- Hussainy said it was encouraging to note that the CAADP agenda required that African Governments strengthen their post harvest loss reduction strategies.
She said production would only be meaningful if efforts to ensure proper storage of produce were enhanced.
‘’…..High yields without proper infrastructure like storage facilities and roads and without robust interventions along the value chain-indeed without proper harvest systems are a waste of time.” Ambassador El- Hussainy said.
FAO representative for Zambia, Mr. George Okech, said post-harvest loss was a critical element in the quest to promote food security, alleviate poverty and foster the economic growth of African countries.
He noted that Africa’s commitment to invest in agriculture was revealed at the AU’s 13 th Heads of State and Government Summit which was themed, ‘’Investing in Agriculture for economic growth and food security.’’
‘’I am pleased to highlight that most African countries are implementing agricultural strategic frameworks that are in line with CAADP.’’ Mr. Okech said.

Although there is increasing  awareness  and knowledge amongst Member States, on the problem of PHL and the positive effect  that reduced losses can make in improving economic growth and  food security situation in the continent,  the capacity of African governments and other stakeholders to address and meet this challenge remains very limited.  It is in an effort to assist in meeting this challenge that AUC in close collaboration with FAO formulated the PHL Project. The project, to be implemented jointly in close collaboration with the RECs, is designed to strengthen the capacity of Governments and other organizations and institutions in the agriculture sector to tackle PHL by filling some of the exiting knowledge and policy gaps.  It is also aimed at promoting increased investments in PHL reduction programmes in the context of the implementation of the CAADP based National Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plans (NAIPs).
The project intends to build regional level capacities of senior technical officials of: Ministries of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries, Trade and Industries, national research organisations and other public sector institutions involved in post-harvest issues of AU Member Countries to identify, design and implement country level projects targeting PHL reduction and introduce methodologies and tools for conducting post-harvest loss assessments.
The three day training workshop intends to provide strategic guidance and practical know how to stakeholders on how to make effective investments in their post-harvest sectors that will promote food security, enterprise development and economic growth as well as filling in the gaps in PHL. It further intends to come up with bankable proposals to be implemented with support from the African Development Bank within countries’ CAADP agricultural investment plans.


Embargoed until 4.30pm GMT (10.30am Peru time) Wednesday 15 May 2013

Vested interests pushing Amazonian highway bill, putting uncontacted groups and the environment at risk under the guise of development

Plans to build a 270 km highway through the Peruvian Amazon are mired in legal violations and potential conflicts of interest, said Global Witness in a new report today.

The Purús highway bill, currently being considered by Peru’s Congress, proposes a new road between Puerto Esperanza (Ucayali) and Iñapari (Madre de Dios) in the Amazon rainforest. This pristine wilderness harbours the richest stands of mahogany left in Peru (1),  and is home to some of the few remaining indigenous groups living in ‘voluntary isolation’(2).

If approved, the new highway would have devastating impacts on the environment and indigenous communities in the area, violating laws on protected areas, the consultation rights of indigenous peoples and protections for ‘uncontacted’ indigenous groups. The Transport Committee, which is charged with making recommendations to Congress, however, has failed to highlight any of these concerns in its official deliberations.

“It is crucial that investment comes to the isolated Purús region to improve services for the population, but there are important questions to be answered over who this project would actually benefit. The huge social and environmental costs that would result from this new highway have not been properly assessed and Congress should vote it down,” said Billy Kyte, campaigner at Global Witness.

Global Witness’ investigation suggests that access to valuable commodities such as timber and gold, which the highway would provide, may be one of the driving factors behind the bill’s support:
  • Local officials previously drew up an illegal contract with logging company Agro Industrial SAC granting logging rights along the road in return for its construction. Priest Miguel Piovesan, a key promoter of the highway locally, led the negotiations over the deal that was never signed in full.
  • Congressman Carlos Tubino, the bill’s main sponsor, was Political Military Head of Ucayali at a time when illegal timber from Purús was openly transported using military planes.
  • Congressman Francisco Ccama, another key supporter, has extensive gold mining interests and potentially stands to benefit through the opening up of new gold reserves. 
“There are so many concerns with this proposal, it’s worrying that things have even got this far. Some of the most vocal supporters of this project have links to timber and gold interests, two commodities sure to be extracted from the area via any new highway. Such voices are dominating the debate while calls from Peru’s National Ministries and indigenous organisations to reject the bill are being ignored.” said Kyte.

The report also documents bribery and other crimes at the local level associated with the highway plans:  
  • Forest is being illegally cleared along the route of the proposed highway, using funds provided by the local municipality in Purús.
  • The Purús municipality has been accused of fraudulently obtaining the signatures of indigenous peoples to falsely claim indigenous peoples’ support for the highway.
  • One indigenous leader was offered a bribe of 30,000 Soles (around US$10,000) to gain the support of indigenous groups for the road project.
Global Witness is calling for the bill to be suspended, pending a full investigation into evidence of legal violations, and potential conflicts of interest.

“Peru’s Congress should suspend the bill. A parliamentary investigative committee needs to urgently look into these allegations whilst the bill’s implications are properly examined”, said Kyte. 




Flood devastation in picturesPublish Date: May 13, 2013
Flood devastation in pictures
  • mail
  • img
Residents of Kilembe Mines quarters in Kasese look on as flood watercontinues to carry away soil from their compounds after damaging some buildings. Pictures courtsey of Reuters
newvision

A house submerged in water after a heavy downpour in Bwaise on May 3
People walk over a bridge that has been damaged by floods caused by torrential rain in Kasese district, 440km (264 miles) southwest from the capital Kampala May 8, 2013.

People displaced by floods walk with their belongings in Kilembe Copper Mines, in Kasese

Damaged electricity lines are seen in Kilembe copper mines

A boy plays near a bridge that was damaged by floods

Mangled metal is seen in front of the homes of Kilembe copper mines workers destroyed by floods

A woman on her way to a contaminated water source

Pallisa-Tirinyi Road was left in a poor state after a heavy downpour

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

 This  is  the  new Tanzania   ambassador to  the  Comoros  H.E CHABAKA  KILUMANGA .Mr kilumanga  was  the deputy  head  of  mission  at  the  Tanzania  mission  in  London.He  is   great  diplomat.We  miss  miss  him in  London

Labour.org.uk

Press release
Tuesday 14th May 2013

For immediate use

Speech to the Police Federation Annual Conference - Yvette Cooper

-CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY-

Yvette Cooper MP, Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary, in a speech to the Police Federation Annual Conference in Bournemouth, said:

Thank you for that welcome John.

It’s a pleasure to be at the Police Federation conference – and to have been following it so far on Twitter.

It’s impressive the way police have embraced twitter as a public forum for debate and also to get out the message on missing persons or public order.

My experience on Twitter has not been quite so successful. I was once excited to find I was trending. Not so excited to find I had managed to tweet from my handbag:

“Hgggg“.

Retweeted many times. Sometimes with a sympathetic comment. Mostly with something along the lines of “what a change to hear a politician talking sense”.

That I suspect is your concern at the Police Federation whenever you have politicians addressing you too.

Your theme this year, 20/20 Vision, Policing the Future Together, is the right one.

Because I don’t believe there is a vision for policing right now

And I think one is needed.

But let me first pay tribute to those police officers lost in service this year

In September the whole of Manchester, and indeed the whole country paid tribute to the bravery of PC Fiona Bone and PC Nicola Hughes

Murdered answering a routine 999 call.

Murdered because they were police officers.

We remember too

Inspector Preston Gurr, DC Adele Cashman, PC Andrew Bramma, PC Bruce Stevenson, PC Steve Rawson, Sgt Ian Harman.

And we should pay special tribute to the remarkable bravery of PC Ian Dibell.

Off duty. And yes, he ran towards danger not away from it. Fatally shot because he went to help others. Proof that a determined police officer is never off duty. Someone the whole country should honour for the bravery he showed to protect us all.

And we’ve seen how the policing family also stand together in tough times. The support I know the Police Federation has shown to the families of those who lost their lives.

And the determination to keep their memories alive.

And a particular thanks to Fed Rep Steve Philips, who has done a charity run from Manchester to Bournemouth, over six days, to raise money for the North West Police Benevolent Fund and the Care of Police Survivors charity in honour of PC Bone and PC Hughes.

I also want to pay tribute to someone I know will be missed here in this hall, who spent his life fighting for British policing and British police officers.

A good man who always had a serious and thoughtful contribution to make to any policing debate. Someone who loved life – which makes it so tragic he has lost it. Many of us know we miss a friend as well as a colleague. I would like to pay tribute and say thank you to a great champion of British policing, Paul McKeever.

And he is also best remembered through his own words, in his last interview with the Fed magazine. They sum up both Paul and Paul’s vision of policing.

When asked what stood out for him in 35 years as a police officer, Paul describes very poignantly taking the father of a young man killed in a motorcycle accident to identify his son in St Thomas’s, and he describes with great sympathy the pain and devastation for a man who has lost a son, then he says “that to me encapsulated the rawness of humanity and the rawness of some of the situations we have to deal with. It’s not just the physicality of dealing with the crime scene, it’s dealing with people”.

And Paul is right.

Policing is a unique public service.

Yes the bravery and the unknown risk – as PC Dibbell, PC Jones and PC Hughes showed us.

Yes fighting crime, catching criminals.

But so much more than that.

Picking up the pieces of people’s broken lives.

And we should thank every officer out there on duty today, who is doing exactly that.

When I first addressed your Conference, two years ago, I said we supported your calls for a Royal Commission or proper review of policing in this country, on how we could work together to prepare a police service truly fit for the 21st century.

When the Government did not agree, we set up the Independent Review into the Future of Policing, chaired by Lord John Stevens. That review is now in its final stages, and it will report in the coming months.

The Review has reached out to over 30,000 officers and staff.

With surveys of staff, evidence from officers, partners, local communities, businesses, members of the public and academia.

I can’t pre-empt the conclusions that they reach. But I want to say a bit about why it matters given the challenges policing faces:

- plummeting morale

- scale of cuts

- chaotic reforms and fragmentation

- policies which risk making it harder not easier to do the job

- And that crucial lack of vision to tackle the challenges of the future

For a start I think it is serious that policing morale has plummeted in the last few years.

You will have seen some of the review research.

Over half of officers and 40 per cent of police staff say they are considering leaving policing.

Officers feeling they could not influence decisions or unhappy about the structure of career progression, or under pressure over pay or pension changes.

Over 90 per cent responding, feeling they were not valued by the Government.

That matters.

It’s not just a problem for the Police Federation, Chief Constables or the Home Secretary.

It’s a problem for all of us.
When policing is under such strain from resource cuts, we need more than ever to have determined, motivated, valued police officers, able to go the extra mile.

British policing relies on the strength and dedication of officers and staff.

That’s why we need better training, support, career development.

But the Government’s reforms are confused. They talk about talents and experience, but they cut starting salaries and make it harder for people with mortgages, experience or families to join the workplace.

We support the College of Policing and think there is much more that it could do.

But that’s not enough.

The police are the public and the public are the police.

Far more women now join the police. But too few make it up through the ranks.

Parents and carers are finding their family friendly working has been ditched as shifts are restructured to meet the cuts.

And too few black and minority ethnic officers being recruited.

And too few black and minority ethnic officers stay on.

We need a police force that is properly rooted in and representative of the communities it serves.

And we need officers who feel valued, well managed and well motivated, with the discretion to get on a do a good job.

We need Government to recognise the value of the job they do.

The second problem has been the scale of cuts.

As you know, we said from the start that 20 per cent cuts went too far and too fast – and we supported 12 per cent cuts instead.

And we are seeing the consequences.

11,500 officers cut already.

At least 15,000 to go in total.

These huge cuts are starting to hollow out policing.

Having to do less with less.

Crime falling more slowly.

But justice falling too.

For ten years while crime came down, we saw a higher proportion of crimes solved, and more offenders brought to justice.

Yet now we are seeing the opposite.

200,000 fewer arrests.

30,000 fewer cases solved

Officers I’ve spoken to know they can’t make arrests because too few officers on the streets and it will take them off the streets for too long when other problems might kick off.

Officers who have told me they’ve had to use Community Resolutions to write cases off – even when they know the crime is serious because they haven’t the time and resources to follow it up.

A quote from an officer who had to write to local businesses and residents to raise the money for a car, “at present we have to rely on lifts from our colleagues in marked vehicles, a pool car, public transport and regularly walking two miles to the nearest point or 10 miles to the farthest point.”

Doesn’t look much like the 21st century does it? Officers thumbing a lift down the dual carriage way to get to the scene of the crime.

Theresa May’s failure to fight for policing in the first spending review hit policing and justice hard.

And with the second spending review looming – they need to do a better job.

It is clear that all those promises the Government made that these cuts would get the deficit down have fallen through because they couldn’t get growth.

Now it looks as though policing and communities will pay the price for the Government’s economic failure again.

But the problem is not just about resources it is about the chaotic nature of reforms and fragmentation that are making it harder not easier for the police to do more with less.

Policing needs to keep reforming to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

But too often the Government’s reforms have been chaotic, piecemeal and confused, creating greater fragmentation and rearranging the deckchairs rather than creating a strong sense of direction and purpose.

Consider Theresa May’s flagship reform, the Police and Crime Commissioners she said would secure “a strong democratic mandate from the ballot box”.

Instead, she spent £100 million on shambolic elections and only one in eight people turned out to vote.

Reforms are needed, but they shouldn’t waste money or create confusion.

They need to be rooted in a positive vision of policing for the future.

That is why the Stevens Review is looking at the different responses needed at local, regional, national and international level to deal with changing patterns of crime and disorder.

And making sure that the great achievements of neighbourhood policing introduced over the last fifteen years are not lost – embedding police properly in local communities, working in partnership to prevent crime and keep order not just flying in to the 999 emergency call.

Many police officers have told me that the Crime and Disorder Act in the late 90s was the most important and powerful reforming legislation on crime in decades. Because it forced not just the police but local councils, probation, the NHS, community organisations to work in partnership to tackle crime.

Yet too many organisations are pulling back and pulling in – retreating to their core business, just when we need partnership more than ever. We need a new push for partnership in leaner times if we are to keep communities safe.

For example we do need a clearer framework for raising standards and taking action when things go wrong.

When things go wrong – as they did so terribly at Hillsborough – we need proper transparent investigations that can get swiftly to the truth, rather than denying victims justice for years, and also casting a shadow over policing too.

That’s why we’ve asked the Stevens review to look at a better framework for standards, inspection and complaints to make sure mistakes are learnt from and not repeated too. How we set up a new Police Standards Authority to replace the IPCC.

But let me say something two area of reforms I know many Federation members are concerned about at the moment.

First compulsory severance, and second private contracting.

I think everyone would agree that standards of policing need to be upheld, and officers need to maintain a proper level of training, skills and ethical standards to do the job. And of course they can’t stay if they don’t.

But I have three concerns about the major changes to the Office of Constable built into the Government’s approach.

First, I fear that this is just a cover for more cuts. You have to wonder why the Government are in such a rush to do this in time for the spending review.

Second, there are insufficient safeguards to prevent abuse or the appearance of abuse in the new climate. If Police and Crime Commissioners can sack Chiefs and Chiefs can sack everyone else with very few safeguards in place, the principle of the independent office of Constable is fundamentally changing.

And that is not something that should be done in such a reckless way.

My third concern is that there was a compact on policing which is being carelessly ripped up without consultation. Police officers can rightly be summoned on duty at any time, as the service of last resort, with few industrial rights. In return police officers had the unique responsibility of the Office of Constable, valued by government and with no compulsory severance.

I never supported the right to strike for police officers and I don’t now. But I do think the Government needs to show respect for the Office of Constable in return.

Did anything exemplify the Office of Constable more than going the extra mile to deliver a safe Olympics?

Officers came to London at short notice, had leave cancelled, holiday re-arranged, personal lives disrupted again, families putting up with it.

And that disruption was made worse when a private contract badly failed.

Yet Ministers are pushing for big private contracts to replace much of the work police do. Nothing ruled out. Not even detective work or neighbourhood patrols.

Massive contracts with single companies for complex work.

And many forces are looking at how to use it for the police.

Be clear, public private partnerships can be valuable – new contracts will be needed for example on information technology.

But contracts must pass tough tests:

-On value for money.
-On resilience and security.
-On transparency and accountability.
-And most of all on public trust.

For the Labour Party, and for people across the country, there are red lines – or perhaps we should say blue lines.

Policing by consent means the police need the confidence of the public.

And the public need to trust that policing is being done in the interests of the justice not the corporate balance sheet.

We should be blunt about this. We don’t want private companies patrolling the public streets of Britain, we want police officers and PCSOs doing the job.

The Government’s job is also to make it easier not harder for the police to do their job.

Too often the reverse is happening.

The DNA of 4,000 rape suspects being destroyed – even though we know rape is a hard crime to solve.

And under their new plans ASBOs will no longer include any criminal sanction if they are breached.

And worst of all, they want to ditch the European Arrest Warrant just because it has Europe in the title.

This is the real consequence of the Conservative party’s frenzy and infighting over Europe.

The European Arrest Warrant allowed us to swiftly deport 900 foreign citizens suspected of crimes in their own country.

And it helped us catch terrorists, kidnappers and serious criminals who fled abroad and bring them back to face justice.

This weekend Spanish police tracked down and arrested Andrew Moran – the Salford man who has been on the run for four years after a £25,000 armed robbery involving guns and a machete.

He was found sunbathing in a villa in Alicante.

Under the European Arrest Warrant he was rapidly arrested and should shortly be returned home.

But remember Ronnie Knight the East End armed robber.

He fled to the Spanish coast too – before the European arrest warrant came in.

He spent his time sunbathing in a luxury villa down the coast from Alicante in Fuengirola.

But unlike Andrew Moran he didn’t have to hide or change his appearance. He opened an Indian Restaurant and R Knights nightclub.

Because we could not get the Spanish police to arrest him and we could not get the Spanish courts to send him home.

The Home Secretary needs to listen to the police and to the evidence on the European Arrest Warrant, not to the hysteria of Tory backbenchers.

If they decide sound tough on everything with Europe in the title, the Government will end up being soft on crime.

Be it about policies on crime, chaotic reforms, resources or morale, in the end the real problem remains in your conference title - where is the 2020 vision?

And where is the plan for policing together for the future?

I don’t believe this Government has a vision for policing.

We want to build a vision for policing with you. Together.

That in the end was what we set up the Stevens commission for. We will look forward to its conclusions.

Building on the international reputation that British policing can be proud of.

From forensics to neighbourhood policing, from counter terror to the Olympics, decade after decade this country has led the way. We want to do so again.

Reforming together.

Protecting the public together.

Cutting crime and getting justice for victims together.

But only if we have the vision of policing together – 2020 policing.
Good day,

H.E. Dr. Tedros Adhanom, Minister of Foreign Affairs, was in London for a 2-day official visit where he met with members of the Diaspora, held talks with UK’s Africa Minister and made a key note address to attendees at the Africa Jubilee Business Forum and Chatham House. Coverage of his visit follows, full text attached.

Kind regards

Angela

·         Minister Tedros Urges Ethiopians in the UK for More Engagement in Nation Building (12th May)

Ethiopian Foreign Minister, H.E. Dr. Tedros Adhanom, met with members of the Ethiopian Diaspora in the UK where he discussed timely and relevant issues focusing on the GTP and highlighting gains made in investment, trade and infrastructure development that are paying dividends to Ethiopians at all levels.

  • Dr. Tedros Addresses Africa Jubilee Business Forum in London (13th May)

Ethiopian Foreign Minister and Chairperson of the Executive Council of the African Union, Dr. Tedros Adhanom told participants at the Africa Jubilee Business Forum that Africa of today is not the Africa of yester years.

The continent is “slowly but surely, shedding off the stereotype images of being  a continent of famines, droughts, conflicts, utter poverty and dictatorships, that portray  Africa to be a lost case in many peoples’ imagination,” he said.

  • Tedros: Africa, the new Eldorado (13th May)

Ethiopian Foreign Minister and Chairman of the African Union Executive Council, H.E. Dr. Tedros Adhanom, told a Chatham House platform that Africa, which was once the marginalised continent, has now emerged, as some put it, "the new Eldorado", at a time when much of the developing world is suffering from the economic slump, thus rekindling a great sense of hope and optimism.
Africa’s profile on the world stage has been raised and it is no exaggeration to state that Africa has now become a force to be reckoned with.
  • Dr. Tedros Meets with UK Minister for Africa (13th May)

Ethiopian Minister of Foreign Affairs, H.E. Dr. Tedros Adhanom, met and held talks with the UK Minister for Africa, Mr. Mark Simmonds MP.

Dr. Tedros briefed the Minister on the situation in Somalia, Sudan and the sub-region as well as the outcomes of the recent IGAD summit and Ministerial meeting.